EFFECTIVENESS OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROTOCOLS IN ACCELERATING POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY FOLLOWING EMERGENCY SURGERY FOR ACUTE ABDOMINAL CONDITIONS
Keywords:
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, ERAS, emergency abdominal surgery, emergency laparotomy, postoperative recovery, perioperative management, gastrointestinal function, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, nutritional support, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, clinical outcomes.Abstract
Emergency surgery for acute abdominal conditions, including intestinal obstruction, perforated gastrointestinal lesions, acute appendicitis, complicated cholecystitis, and diffuse peritonitis, is associated with substantial physiological stress and an increased risk of postoperative complications. Conventional postoperative management may involve prolonged fasting, delayed mobilization, excessive opioid administration, and unnecessary maintenance of invasive devices. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols represent a multidisciplinary approach designed to minimize surgical stress, preserve physiological function, and facilitate safe recovery. Although ERAS principles are well established in elective surgery, their application in emergency abdominal surgery requires adaptation to the severity of the underlying disease and the patient's clinical condition. A narrative literature review was conducted using published clinical guidelines, consensus recommendations, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses addressing perioperative care in emergency abdominal surgery. Particular attention was given to postoperative length of hospital stay, gastrointestinal recovery, postoperative complications, mobilization, pain management, nutritional support, and the safety of early discharge. Evidence from studies comparing ERAS-based management with conventional perioperative care was critically assessed. No original patient cohort was recruited, and no new clinical data were generated. Published evidence suggests that ERAS-based care may shorten postoperative hospitalization, accelerate the return of bowel function, reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting, and facilitate earlier mobilization. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis involving 20 studies included 1,615 patients managed using ERAS protocols and 1,933 patients receiving conventional care. The analysis reported a reduction in hospital stay of approximately 3.35 days in upper gastrointestinal surgery and 2.80 days in lower gastrointestinal surgery. A separate 2024 meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials involving 509 patients also reported shorter hospitalization and improvements in several postoperative outcomes. Nevertheless, the certainty of evidence varies, and the effects of individual ERAS components remain difficult to separate.
References
1. Peden C. J., Aggarwal G., Aitken R. J., et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: Part 1—Preoperative: Diagnosis, Rapid Assessment and Optimization. World Journal of Surgery. 2021;45(5):1272–1290. Springer Nature.
2. Scott M. J., Aggarwal G., Aitken R. J., et al. Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations, Part 2—Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care. World Journal of Surgery. 2023;47(8):1850–1880. Springer Nature.
3. Peden C. J., Aggarwal G., Aitken R. J., et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Consensus Guidelines for Emergency Laparotomy, Part 3: Organizational Aspects and General Considerations for Management of the Emergency Laparotomy Patient. World Journal of Surgery. 2023;47(8):1881–1898. Springer Nature.
4. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1997;78(5):606–617. Oxford University Press.
5. McKechnie T., Tessier L., Archer V., Park L., Cohen D., Levac B., Parpia S., Bhandari M., Dionne J., Eskicioglu C. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols following emergency intra-abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2024;50(3):679–704. Springer Nature.
6. Evaluating the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols following emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. The American Journal of Surgery. 2024;236:115857. Elsevier.
7. World Health Organization. Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
8. Berríos-Torres S. I., Umscheid C. A., Bratzler D. W., et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surgery. 2017;152(8):784–791. American Medical Association.
9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Surgical Site Infections: Prevention and Treatment. NICE Guideline NG125. London: NICE; 2019.
10. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009: Safe Surgery Saves Lives. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.